Legal Opinion

Cook v. Bingman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 8, 1947No. 32351PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArnold, J.

Plaintiff commenced his action in the district court of Okmulgee county August 12, 1941. By the amended petition,', upon which the-case was tried,” he sought judgment for the sum of $40,-. 000 actual damages and $10,000 punitive damage for the alleged conversion of certain personal property described as oil well drilling tools, equipment and. supplies. O. A. Bingman died in June, 1943, and the action was duly revived' against his executors, but the case proceeded to trial under the original caption. The allegations of plaintiff’s ■ amended petition, and his evidence in support thereof, may be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Purcell Bank & Trust Co. of Purcell v. ByarsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. State Ex Rel. v. Board of Com'rs of Pontotoc CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Sinclair Prairie Oil Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Hyde Construction Co. v. StevensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Oklahoma City Federal Savings & L. Ass'n v. SwatekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jackson v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. Riverside National Bank v. ManolakisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Rutledge v. Verdigris Valley Economic Development Corp. (In Re Tulsa Industrial Facilities, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1995
  4. Hillers v. Local Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  5. Hillers v. Local Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API