Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. v. Board of Com'rs of Lincoln County

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 22, 1946No. 32103PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

It is urged that the appeal should be dismissed because the appeal is by transcript.

The trial court sustained demurrer to the petition and upon refusal of plaintiff to amend dismissed the action. In urging dismissal of this appeal it is said that plaintiff’s election to stand or the refusal to amend is equivalent to a motion by plaintiff to dismiss, and that such a motion to dismiss cannot be reviewed upon transcript. We do not agree that such proceedings amounted to a motion on the part of plaintiff to dismiss.

It is further urged that the appeal should be dismissed because it is said that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Territory Ex Rel. Johnston v. WoolseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. State Ex Rel. Schilling v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. State Ex Rel. Sweeney v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. McGuire v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. State Ex Rel. v. Board of Com'rs of Pontotoc CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wright v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  2. City of Oklahoma City v. Oklahoma City Urban Renewal AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. State Ex Rel. Schones v. Town of CanuteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. State Ex Rel. Schones v. Town of CanuteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. State Ex Rel. Wright v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API