Legal Opinion

Vaughan v. Latta

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 5, 1934No. 23771PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

The plaintiff sought to institute and maintain the action under sections 5964 and 59®, O. S. 1931. Those sections authorize a taxpayer of a town to maintain an action to recover property or money of the town transferred or paid out illegally or without authority. The purpose of this action is to recover certain property transferred to defendants by the officers of the town of May, and to recover certain sums of money from the defendants by way of accounting for the same to the town of May. Such action is authorized to be maintained for the joint benefit of the taxpayer and the town. Such…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Waters of Chewaucan RiverOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  2. State Ex Rel. Schilling v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. McGuire v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. State Ex Rel. v. Board of Com'rs of Pontotoc CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Youngberg v. YoungbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Application of GoodwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. State Ex Rel. Trimble v. City of MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  3. Cummings v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. State Ex Rel. Remy v. City of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  5. Teleco, Inc. v. CORP. COM'N OF STATE OF OKL.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API