Legal Opinion

Koepple v. Morrison

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 23, 1927No. Docket No. 5392PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The petitioner and appellant, a former member of the legal profession who was disbarred on Febru ary 24, 1925, brought an action upon a claim assigned to him for the purpose of collection only in the justice’s court of Santa Ana township, where he stipulated to the fact that judgment of disbarment had been entered against him, and that the chose in action was assigned to him solely for the purpose of collection. Upon that stipulation the respondent, Justice of the Peace, refused to permit the petitioner to proceed with the trial and declined to hear him further, whereupon he filed a petition…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of Application of MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Greig v. RiordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Laurel Hill Cemetery v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. In Re FinleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  5. Matter of the Application of BarmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Harrison v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Kepler v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Cohn v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Clark v. AndrewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Rauer's Law & Collection Co. v. HigginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API