Matter of the Application of Barmore
California Supreme Court
. APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The petitioner is held in custody on a charge of violating an ordinance of the city of Los Angeles, and seeks his release by means of a writ of habeas corpus.
The ordinance is one “regulating the business of soliciting custom or patronage upon the public streets, boats, railway trains and depots, and providing for the issuance of permits therefor.” The provision here in question is contained in section 9 of the ordinance, which, so far as it need be quoted, declares that-“it shall be unlawful for any person to solicit custom or patronage upon any boat, . . . or in any depot, ... for any hotel,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Williams v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Ex Parte Quong WoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- City of Seattle v. HurstWashington Supreme Court · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- McKay Jewelers, Inc. v. BowronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Brown v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Hart v. City of Beverly HillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Town of Green River v. Fuller Brush Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Town of Green River v. BungerWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.