Legal Opinion
Kepler v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
Decided July 22, 1932No. Docket No. L.A. 13414PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Petitioner seeks by this application to be reinstated to practice as an attorney at law, notwithstanding the denial to him of the favorable recommendation of the Board of Bar Governors of the state of California. On February 24, 1925, petitioner was disbarred from the further practice of law by a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of San Joaquin. Said judgment was based upon three counts: “That the defendant, Leland S. Kepler, has committed acts involving moral turpitude and dishonesty, (1) In assuming a position adverse to the interest of his client, C. E. Jubb, (2) In…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re MashCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- In Re CateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- In Re CateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- In Re NisbetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Koepple v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- In the Matter of HissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- In Re StumpCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- In Re NevillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Feinstein v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- In re SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.