Legal Opinion
Harrison v. Adams
California Supreme Court
Decided August 3, 1942No. L. A. 17675, 17706PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
The judgment from which the plaintiff has appealed must be reversed if a chose in action, which has been assigned for collection, may be used by the assignee as a set-off against the judgment creditor of the assignee. The record in L. A. 17675 shows a notice of appeal from a portion of the judgment. Under a second notice of appeal from the whole of the same judgment, a transcript was filed under L. A. 17706. The two appeals have been consolidated, and following the death of R. E. Harrison, the appellant, the executrix of his estate, was substituted for him.
In a previous action, Henry J. Adams…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Toby v. Oregon Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Purdy v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- National Reserve Co. of America v. Metropolitan Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- McKenney v. EllsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- McBride v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Fassberg Construction Co. v. Housing AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- In Re Coupon Clearing Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Jones v. MortimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Prudential Reinsurance Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- United States v. WinnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.