Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. Seattle Marine & Fishing Supply Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided April 1, 1977No. 2695PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before BOOCHEVER, C. J., and RABI-NOWITZ, CONNOR, ERWIN and BURKE, JJ. RABINO WITZ, Justice.
This appeal arises out of the prolonged attempts by Donald and Margaret Hamilton to prevent a judgment creditor, Seattle Marine & Fishing Supply Co., from executing upon an Alaska money judgment which was granted on the basis of a judgment obtained in the State of Washington.
On August 1, 1969, appellee Seattle Marine obtained a judgment in the State of Washington for $6,014 plus interest against appellants Donald and Margaret Hamilton. 1 In 1970, Seattle Marine filed a complaint in Alaska…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Groseth v. NessAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
- Silverton v. MarlerAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
- Jakoski v. HollandAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Burns v. Anchorage Funeral ChapelAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Lillegraven v. TengsAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Watson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division Ex Rel. Inman v. DeanAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.District Court, D. Alaska · 1977
- First of Denver Mortgage Investors v. RiggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- National Union Fire Insurance v. NicholasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.