Legal Opinion

Jakoski v. Holland

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1974No. 1724 and 1795PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOOCHEVER, Justice.

Jacqueline and Carl Jakoski appeal from the August 9, 1972 final judgment in the superior court, pursuant to a jury award to them of $18,000 in their action against H. Russel Holland. The main appeal raises two evidentiary questions — whether the trial judge erroneously excluded relevant evidence and admitted irrelevant, prejudicial, evidence — and challenges the award as being contrary to the weight of the evidence. The cross-appeal initiated by defendant Holland raises the question of whether Mr. Jakoski’s loss of consortium claim was barred by the running of the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Palfy v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Cooper v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Graham v. RockmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Otis Elevator Company v. McLaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Adkins v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Poulin v. ZartmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Hayes v. Xerox Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Hutchins v. SchwartzAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Continental Insurance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API