Legal Opinion

Lillegraven v. Tengs

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1962No. 173PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOND, Justice.

The appellant, Rosellen Lillegraven (referred to here as the “plaintiff”), was injured in a motor vehicle collision on the Alaska Highway in the Canadian province of British Columbia. She commenced this action for damages against the appellee, Martin Tengs (referred to in this opinion as the “defendant”), who was the owner of the automobile in which she was a passenger at the time of the accident. He was not present, but he had furnished the car for his wife who had arranged for plaintiff and a friend, Susan Barrow, to accompany her on a “share-the-expense” trip from Seattle,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. The HarrisburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Davis v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Webb v. City and Borough of SitkaAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Wilson v. PolletAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Byrne v. OgleAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Armstrong v. ArmstrongAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Douglas v. Beneficial Finance Co. of AnchorageDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API