Legal Opinion

Fiumefreddo v. McLean

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided January 26, 1993No. 91-2264PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.

This is an action to recover damages as the result of alleged medical malpractice during the course of an operation to remove Joseph Fiumefreddo's thymus gland. The gland was removed in an attempt to treat Fiumefreddo's myasthenia gravis, a severely debilitating neurologic disease. The operation was performed by George B. Haasler, M.D., and Thomas McLean, M.D. Fiumefreddo's recurrent laryngeal nerve was damaged during the operation, and, as a result, one of his vocal cords was permanently paralyzed. Fiumefreddo appeals the judgments entered on a jury verdict finding both Dr. Haasler and Dr.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Collins v. Eli Lilly & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Eberhardy v. Circuit Court for Wood CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State Ex Rel. Jackson v. CoffeyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Hoven v. KelbleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Peplinski v. Fobe's Roofing, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Richards v. MendivilCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  3. Hauer v. Union State Bank of WautomaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  4. Steinberg v. ArcillaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  5. Houseman v. United States Aviation UnderwritersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API