Legal Opinion

Houseman v. United States Aviation Underwriters

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 29, 1999No. 98-1637PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

Following the crash of a small airplane in 1995, a passenger sued the pilot for negligence. During discovery, the passenger attempted to add as a defendant the manufacturer of an air filter used in the airplane based on theories of negligence and products liability. Instead of staying the entire case so the manufacturer could prepare, the court ordered separate trials, first of the passenger’s claim against the pilot followed by his claims against the manufacturer. Arguing that this bifurcation order severely prejudiced his suit and violated the Seventh Amendment, the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. In the Matter of Rhone-Poulenc Rorer IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Houskins v. SheahanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Vincent J. Krocka, Cross-Appellee v. City of Chicago, an Illinois Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  3. Simon v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2001
  4. Mary A. Freeman v. Chicago Park DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  5. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dial Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API