Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Jackson v. Coffey

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1963PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

Petitioners assert several grounds for challenging Judge Coffey’s authority to commit them to jail in order to compel them to answer questions. It will be seen that our conclusion on the first ground requires that the writ of prohibition restraining Judge Coffey from compelling petitioners’ testimony under sec. 325.34, Stats, (the immunity statute) be made absolute. The parties have, however, briefed and argued the other grounds, and it is reasonable to expect that if these questions are not now disposed of they will be raised repeatedly in the John Doe proceeding out of which these petitions…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Twining v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Byars v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Adamson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. La Crosse Tribune v. Circuit Court for La Crosse CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Hull v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. ArmstrongWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. WashingtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. CummingsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API