Richards v. Mendivil
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, P.J.
In this appeal we conclude that leaving a portion of a nontherapeutic localization hook wire in Terry Richards's right breast is a situation where expert testimony as to the standard of care is not required. We reverse the trial court's order granting Dr. Jairo Mendivil's motions after verdict and dismissing the complaint because a layperson can reasonably infer that Mendivil failed to exercise proper care and skill during surgery when he left a foreign object in Richards's body.
In early 1991, Richards was referred to Mendivil when a mammogram showed the possibility of malignant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Weiss v. United Fire & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Hoven v. KelbleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Fehrman v. SmirlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Bennett v. Larsen Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Fiumefreddo v. McLeanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Diego Gil v. James Reed, Jaime Penaflor, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Gil v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Lagerstrom v. Myrtle Werth Hospital-Mayo Health SystemWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. Abbott LaboratoriesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- Anderson Ex Rel. Skow v. Alfa-Laval Agri, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.