Legal Opinion

Steinberg v. Arcilla

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided May 23, 1995No. 94-1572PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.

Jacqueline and Michael Steinberg brought this lawsuit against Senen Arcilla, M.D., to recover for injuries they contend that Jacqueline Stein-berg suffered during an operation at which Dr. Arcilla was the anesthesiologist. The jury found that Dr. Arcilla was not negligent. The Steinbergs appeal from the judgment entered upon the verdict. They assert the following claims of trial-court error: first, that the trial court improperly admitted as evidence under RULE 904.06, Stats., Dr. Arcilla's testimony about his usual practice in positioning the arms of patients under his anesthesiological care…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gross v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  2. State v. PharrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Schuster v. AltenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Hart v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Fischer Ex Rel. Fischer v. GanjuWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Nowatske v. OsterlohWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Majorowicz v. Allied Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  3. Anderson Ex Rel. Skow v. Alfa-Laval Agri, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  4. Hoffart v. HodgeNebraska Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Burks v. St. Joseph's HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API