Legal Opinion

Chicago & Erie Railroad v. Smith

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1893No. 702PublishedCited by 20 opinions

From the Wells Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, C. J.

This was an action by the appellee against the appellant, for damages on account of fire escaping from a locomotive engine on the appellant’s railroad running through the appellee’s land.

The first error assigned is the overruling of the appellant's demurrer to the complaint. The complaint is in two paragraphs. The demurrer is joint and so is the assignment of error. If either paragraph was sufficient, therefore, the ruling must be upheld. Ketcham v. Barbour, Exec., 102 Ind. 576; State, ex rel., v. Faurote, 104 Ind. 287; Redel-sheimer, Exec., v. Miller, 107 Ind. 485.

Assuming, however, that the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kirkpatrick v. ReevesIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railway Co. v. BurgerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. BrannaganIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. NitscheIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Fort Wayne, Cincinnati & Louisville Railway Co. v. BeyerleIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Vine Street Corporation v. City of Council BluffsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Indiana Horseshoe Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Shields v. PylesIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. SparksIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Calahan v. DunkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API