Legal Opinion

Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. Brannagan

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 7782PublishedCited by 42 opinions

From the Carroll Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The complaint of the appellee alleges that the appellant is a corporation owning and operating a line of railway extending through the city of Delphi; that the corporation constructed a track across Washington street, a, public street of said city; that, in constructing said track the appellant constructed a drain and culvert under its track in said street, at a point where the street was crossed by said track; that the drain was of the depth of six feet, and', of the width of five feet; that appellant negligently permitted a portion of the culvert across said drain to remain, open and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Warner v. . the New York Cen. R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Cordell v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Whittaker v. Inhabitants of West BoylstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. LockeIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Nave v. FlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. ButlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Town of Gosport v. EvansIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API