Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Sparks

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 1895No. 1,473PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Floyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Reinhard, J. —

The appellees are husband and wife, and this action was brought by them against the appellant for damages to the real estate of the wife on account of the alleged negligence of the appellant in reconstructing a culvert near its railroad and the said real estate, causing the water to back, overflow and stand upon the same, and injuring it in various ways, and injuring the crops thereon and the health of the appellee, Fannie A. Sparks.

In the court below the appellees’ recovered.

At the trial appellees’ counsel propounded to John P. Sparks, the husband and witness of Fannie A.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. EberleIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Brunker v. CumminsIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. City of Fort Wayne v. HamiltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Chicago & Erie Railroad v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Charlie Stuart Oldsmobile, Inc. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Lasalle Realty Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Johnson v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. SeerleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. Vandalia Railroad v. YeagerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API