Legal Opinion

Shields v. Pyles

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1912No. 21,750PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Prom Jackson. Circuit Court; David A. Kochenour, Special Judge. Petition by Jesse Pyles and others for the establishment of a drain. Prom a judgment confirming the assessments of the drainage commissioners, establishing the drain and appointing a construction commissioner, Ewing Shields and others appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

Appellee Pyles and fifteen other landowners filed on September 30, 1907, a petition in the Jackson Circuit Court for the drainage of certain lands and highways. Such proceedings Avere thereafter had without any objection *74interposed, that on November 25, 1908, a report of commissioners was filed, reporting the proposed work to be of public utility, to be practicable, and that it would improve the public health, and benefit highways and free gravel roads, and that the costs would be less than the benefits to the lands assessed. By that report additional lands to those named in the petition were…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Moore v. SargentIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Thorn v. SilverIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Stout v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Meranda v. SpurlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Chicago & Erie Railroad v. LuddingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1910

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ball Stores, Inc. v. State Board of Tax CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Leathers, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Wilson v. TevisIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Huffman v. NewleeIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Woodring v. McCaslinIndiana Supreme Court · 1914

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API