Legal Opinion

State v. Kizer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1989No. TC 87-0839; CA A47568; SC S35865PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*240LINDE, J.

Under the 1971 revision of the Oregon Criminal Code, a person commits forgery if “with intent to injure or defraud, the person:

“(a) Falsely makes, completes or alters a written instrument; or
“(b) Utters a written instrument which the person knows to be forged.”

ORS 165.007(1). A later statute, ORS 161.062(1), provides:

“When the same conduct or criminal episode violates two or more statutory provisions and each provision requires proof of an element that the others do not, there are as many separately punishable offenses as there are separate statutory violations. * * *.”1

The question…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. CrotsleyOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. WoolardOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State v. WoolardOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Daugharty v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. BarrettOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. WalravenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API