State v. Miller
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*364JONES, J.
The issue is whether a defendant may be convicted of violating ORS 813.010 without proof of a culpable mental state as to the element of being under the influence of an intoxicant. We hold that being under the influence of an intoxicant is a strict liability element and, therefore, affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.
On January 16, 1988, an Oregon State Police officer arrested defendant for Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants (DUII). An Intoxilizer test registered defendant’s blood alcohol content (BAG) at 0.12 percent. Defendant waived his right to a jury trial, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. ButtreyOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. KizerOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. Chang Hwan ChoOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. ReynoldsOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. CorpuzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- State v. TurnidgeOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Mercer v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. OlmsteadOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. HedgpethOregon Supreme Court · 2019
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.