State v. White
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*277BALMER, J.
The issue in this criminal case is whether, under ORS 161.067(1), the trial court should have merged defendant’s guilty verdicts for two counts of second-degree robbery that arose out of the same criminal episode. One count was based on ORS 164.405(1)(a) (robbery while purporting to be armed with a dangerous weapon), and the other was based on ORS 164.405(1)(b) (robbery when aided by the actual presence of another person). The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s decision not to merge the guilty verdicts on the two counts. State v. White, 217 Or App 214, 175 P3d 504 (2007).…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. CrotsleyOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. BarrettOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. KizerOregon Supreme Court · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- State v. ParkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. HuffmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. BlakeOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. HamiltonOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.