Legal Opinion

State v. Crotsley

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1989No. TC CM 86-0273, CM 86-0293; CA A41802; SC S35916PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

We allowed review in this case solely to interpret the first sentence of ORS 161.062(1):

“When the same conduct or criminal episode violates two or more statutory provisions and each provision requires proof of an element that the others do not, there are as many separately punishable offenses as there are separate statutory violations.”

The issue here is whether separate first and third degree convictions and sentences may be imposed for a single act of rape or sodomy. On the present facts, we hold that separate convictions and sentences may be imposed.

I

Defendant appealed convictions for third…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. CrotsleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. State v. ParkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. BarrettOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. BowenOregon Supreme Court · 2006

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API