Legal Opinion

One Star, Inc. v. Staar Surgical Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 2009No. B212098PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SUZUKAWA, J.

INTRODUCTION

Code of Civil Procedure section 998 (section 998) provides that if a plaintiff does not accept a defendant’s pretrial settlement offer and then fails to obtain a more favorable judgment at trial, the defendant may recover its costs incurred after the settlement offer. Here, defendant/appellant STAAR Surgical Company (STAAR) made two separate pretrial offers to settle plaintiff/respondent One Star, Inc.’s claims against it, but withdrew the second settlement offer before its statutory expiration. One Star did not accept either offer, and ultimately recovered less…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. T. M. Cobb Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Scott Co. of California v. Blount, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Wilson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Mangano v. Verity, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Westamerica Bank v. Mbg Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Martinez v. Brownco Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Linton v. Cnty. of Contra Costa, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. Litt v. Eisenhower Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Hersey v. Vopava, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. Gorobets v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2026

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API