Linton v. Cnty. of Contra Costa
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtMargulies, J.
*631Plaintiff Janet Linton appeals from an order denying her request for attorney fees. Linton contends defendants County of Contra Costa (County), Greater Richmond Inter-Faith Program, and Dennis Jauregui's (jointly, defendants) acceptance of her offer to compromise under Code of Civil Procedure section 998 ( section 998 ) entitled her to fees because it expressly provided for "attorney's fees allowed by law as determined by the court." While Linton's section 998 offer provided her the right to seek attorney fees as "allowed by law," we conclude no such fees were in fact "allowed by law."…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Badie v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- White v. Western Title InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Folsom v. Butte County Assn. of GovernmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Brant v. California Dairies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Alvarado v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- Gutierrez v. Chopard USA Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2022
- Jenell Rivera v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. et al.District Court, C.D. California · 2026
- Kim v. TWA Construction, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2022
- Mikki v. Lifemark Group, Inc. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021