Legal Opinion

Mangano v. Verity, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 22, 2008No. H030999, H031234PublishedCited by 25 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MIHARA, Acting P. J.

Plaintiff and appellant Thomas Mangano appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of his employer, defendant and appellant Verity, Inc. (Verity), and his former supervisor, defendant and appellant Steven R. Springsteel. Mangano claimed discrimination and verbal harassment based on a perceived disability in violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), Government Code section 12900 et seq. We concur with the trial court’s conclusion that defendants are entitled to summary judgment on the FEHA claim…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Scott Co. of California v. Blount, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Cummings v. Benco Building ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Bank of San Pedro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Seever v. Copley Press, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Williams v. Chino Valley Independent Fire DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Leek v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. SCI California Furneral Services, Inc. v. Five Bridges FoundationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Etcheson v. FCA US LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Holman v. Altana Pharma US, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API