Legal Opinion
Associates in Obstetrics & Gynecology v. Upper Merion Township
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 16, 2003No. Civil Action 03-2313PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BAYLSON, District Judge.
The principal issue for decision is whether the entry of a state court injunction against one of the plaintiffs preventing operation of its business as an abortion provider warrants dismissal for failure to state a federal constitutional claim, declination of jurisdiction, or abstention, of the provider’s civil rights claims in this Court for damages, and injunctive relief conflicting with the state court’s injunction.
Plaintiff Associates in Obstetrics & Gynecology (“Associates”), a provider of abortion services in King of Prussia Pennsylvania, on behalf of…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Pappas v. City of LebanonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Eichenlaub v. Township of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Eichenlaub v. Township Of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Nicolette v. CarusoDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Cherry Hill Towers, L.L.C. v. Township of Cherry HillDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.