Legal Opinion
Eichenlaub v. Township of Indiana
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 21, 2004No. 03-2707PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHERTOFF, Circuit Judge.
Appellants, members of the Eichenlaub family and their family-owned business, have been embroiled in a contentious zoning dispute with Appellees, the Township of Indiana, Pennsylvania, and several of its officials. The controversy arises from the Eichenlaubs’ desire to develop certain pieces of property, and from the Township’s insistence that the development comply with a number of regulations. The disagreement has engendered claims that Township officials violated the Eichen-laubs’ substantive due process and equal protection rights by denying or delaying…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Bridges v. GilbertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Galena Ex Rel. Erie County v. LeoneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Wurtz v. Rawlings Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Brown v. TucciDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Tichinin v. City of Morgan HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.