Legal Opinion

St. Louis Jewelry Co. v. Bennett

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 11, 1907No. 15,032PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from Jewell district court; Richard M. Pickler, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

The St. Louis Jewelry Company, a partnership, brought an action against J. W. Bennett to recover $196 for jewelry alleged to have been sold and delivered to him and for which he refused *744payment. In the petition the company set up what is claimed to be a written contract of sale. In his answer Bennett alleged that he signed the alleged contract but that he was induced to do so by the false and fraudulent representations of the company. He averred that the agreement made with the company was not to,purchase the goods, but rather that he…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  2. De Lissa v. Fuller Coal & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1898
  3. Deming Investment Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. Alexander v. BarkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  5. Scandinavian Coal & Mining Co. v. WhittakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tanton v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  2. Disney v. St. Louis Jewelry Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Rose v. BoyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. Demund v. BensonArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Brenard Manufacturing Co. v. ScrantonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API