Legal Opinion

Demund v. Benson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1928No. Civil No. 2687PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

— This action was brought by DeMund against the Bensons to collect certain notes, and to foreclose a mortgage given to, secure the same, running from defendants to plaintiff.

It appears that on December 5th, 1924, DeMund and the defendants, husband and wife, entered into a conditional contract of sale, by the terms of which plaintiff agreed to sell, and the defendants agreed to purchase, a lot in Fairview addition to Phoenix, for the sum of $1,000, to be paid as follows: First payment of $100 by 30-day note of defendants, and balance at $15 per month. On the eighth day of December a like…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shook v. Puritan Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Tanton v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. Deming Investment Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. Disney v. St. Louis Jewelry Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  5. Smith v. MosbargerArizona Supreme Court · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Julian v. CarpenterArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Bowman v. HallArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Schmitt v. SappArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Nelson v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  5. State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API