Legal Opinion

Tanton v. Martin

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 10, 1909No. 15,956PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from Sedgwick district court; Thomas C. Wilson, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

In this action plaintiff sought to recover $200 from defendants as cash rent for the use of a house in accordance with the terms of a lease to which defendants’ names were signed. The defendants answered admitting the signing of the lease but alleging that they orally agreed with plaintiff’s agent to lease plaintiff’s farm for a year and pay as rent two-*23fifths of the grain raised on the farm, and also $60 for the use of grass lands, and that plaintiff’s agent proposed that' he should reduce the agreement to the form of a written lease…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shook v. Puritan Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Deming Investment Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. Kansas Mill Owners' & Manufacturers' Mutual Fire Insurance v. RammelsbergSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  4. Disney v. St. Louis Jewelry Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  5. St. Louis Jewelry Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cox v. Pabst Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  2. Dodson v. AbercrombieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  3. Hewey v. FoutsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. Hockett v. EarlSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  5. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. BrunSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API