Legal Opinion

Brenard Manufacturing Co. v. Scranton

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 10, 1924No. 25,239PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*94The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bukch, J.:

The action was one to recover on promissory notes, given for the price of three “Golden-Throated” Claxtonolas, and a dozen double-disc ten-inch records. The defense was that the notes were procured by fraud. Defendant, by cross-petition, prayed for recovery of money expended in connection with the fraudulent transaction. Defendant recovered, and plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff is a partnership, whose principal place of business is Iowa City, Iowa. Defendant is a dealer in lumber and hardware, at Syracuse, Kan. Plaintiff’s agent, Strole, solicited…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pfiester v. Missouri State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. Griesa v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. Shook v. Puritan Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  4. Tanton v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. Deming Investment Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. White Sewing Machine Co. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  2. Boxer v. Watchorn Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  3. Diehl v. BarkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  4. Lumbar v. EricksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  5. Stevens v. ColeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API