Legal Opinion

Pahmeier v. Rogers

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 22, 1936No. 15,264PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wood, J. —

The only error which the appellant relies upon for a reversal of this cause is the overruling of her motion for a new trial. The only causes for a new trial not waived and discussed in her brief are two, both of which relate to rulings of the trial court on the admission and exclusion of evidence.

To determine whether the trial court committed error in its ruling on either of these causes for a new trial would require an examination of the evidence, and that is not before us, for what purports to be the original bill of exceptions containing the evidence is not properly certified by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Butt v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Robinsons v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Emulsified Asphalt Co. v. City of ColumbusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Metropolitan Realty Co. v. PayneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tinkham v. TinkhamIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. MURPHY v. HendrickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Radcliff v. MeishbergerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Clamme v. HutchersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. DIANE COMPANY, INC., ETC. v. BeebeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API