Legal Opinion

Radcliff v. Meishberger

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 2, 1942No. 17,036PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Flanagan, C. J. —

The only questions herein presented require an examination of the evidence and that is not. before us. The document attached to the transcript which purports to be an original bill of exceptions containing the evidence is inserted in the transcript after the clerk’s certificate, is not certified by that official and is therefore not a part of the record. Pahmeier v. Rogers (1936), 102 Ind. App. 480, 1 N. E. (2d) 287; Mercantile Discount Corp. v. Clark (1922), 78 Ind. App. 313, 135 N. E. 490.

On August 31, 1942, the appellant filed a petition in this court praying that this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pahmeier v. RogersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Mercantile Discount Corp. v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. MURPHY v. HendrickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. DIANE COMPANY, INC., ETC. v. BeebeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Edwards v. Evansville City Coach Lines, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. City of Bloomington v. HancockIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Weiland v. ScheuchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API