Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Johnson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1901No. 19,311PublishedCited by 42 opinions

Prom the Wells Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

Appellee brought this action against appellants on two promissory notes, signed by appellant James Johnson, payable to James N. Johnson. It was averred that “said promissory notes were assigned and transferred by said payee by delivery, for a valuable consideration to appellee, who is the owner thereof; that said James N. Johnson-died, and afterwards, appellant Solomon Johnson was duly appointed administrator of his said estate, and he is made a party defendant to answer as to any interest said estate may have in said notes.” Appellant James Johnson filed a plea of non est factum as to both…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Deal v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Shields v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Wenning v. TeepleIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. McCaslin v. Advance Manufacturing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Dotlich v. DotlichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Chestnut v. Southern Indiana Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. City of Beech Grove v. SchmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Workman v. State ex rel. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Smith v. SwitzerIndiana Supreme Court · 1933

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API