Redevelopment Commission of High Point v. Denny Roll & Panel Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
The issue as to the amount of damages or compensation was for determination de novo by jury trial in the superior court. G.S. 40-19; G.S. 40-20; Proctor v. Highway Commission, 230 N.C. 687, 55 S.E. 2d 479; Gallimore v. Highway Comm., 241 N.C. 350, 85 S.E. 2d 392; Redevelopment Commission v. Smith, 272 N.C. 250, 158 S.E. 2d 65.
There was evidence that, in the appraisal of property, there are three standard approaches, namely, (1) the cost approach, (2) the income approach, and (3) the market comparison approach; that the cost approach involves a determination of the fair market value of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Proctor v. Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- State Highway Commission v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- North Carolina State Highway Commission v. CogginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- North Carolina State Highway Commission v. PearceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- North Carolina State Highway Commission v. HeldermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Duke Power Co. v. WinebargerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Cochran v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Huff v. ThorntonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.