Legal Opinion

North Carolina State Highway Commission v. Pearce

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 1964No. 533PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

All matters in dispute were settled by a consent judgment except the amount of just compensation which the plaintiff is due the defendants for the taking of a perpetual easement for highway purposes over their lands. With its declaration of taking, the plaintiff had deposited the sum of $5,950.00 as its estimate of the amount due. The defendants, in their answer, demanded $20,000.00. The jury fixed the recovery at $8,500.00.

The defendants demand a new trial upon the asserted ground the trial judge committed errors of law in three particulars: (1) By refusing to permit defendants’ witnesses…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. Brown v. . Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Harmon v. HarmonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. ErlewineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Carver v. LykesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. North Carolina State Highway Commission v. HeldermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API