Duke Power Co. v. Winebarger
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Justice.
Respondents Worth and Rebecca Winebarger appeal from a judgment on a verdict assessing damages of $16,000 to compensate them for petitioner’s taking of an electric power line easement and right-of-way over their land. Error is assigned to certain evidentiary rulings and instructions thereon by the trial judge during trial. For errors committed in these rulings on questions propounded on cross-examination of respondents’ expert witnesses, we reverse the Court of Appeals and grant respondents a new trial.
The gist of this appeal lies in respondents’ disagreement with the adequacy…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Shelton v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- State v. . RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- State v. HunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- Dare County Board of Education v. SakariaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Department of Transportation v. BraggSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Colonial Pipeline Co. v. WeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.