Legal Opinion
American Totalisator Co., Inc. v. Seligman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 30, 1980No. 162, 170PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
O’BRIEN, Justice.
The instant controversy concerns the competitive bidding process and award of a contract for the supply of equipment *571and technology to be used for the Daily Numbers Game operated by the Bureau of State Lotteries.
On February 19, 1976, the Bureau of State Lotteries issued a request for proposal, inviting companies to submit bids for a computerized daily numbers game. Appellant, American Totalisator Company, Inc., and intervenor-appellee, Control Data Corporation, were the only companies to submit bids. The request for proposal stated that the contract would…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Blumenschein v. Pittsburgh Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Lutz Appellate Printers, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Lutz Appellate Printers, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Property & SuppliesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- American Totalisator Co. v. SeligmanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- American Totalisator Co. v. SeligmanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
3Cited by66 opinions
- Ezy Parks v. LarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Ara Services, Inc. v. School District of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Xpress Truck Lines, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Gaeta v. Ridley School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Teleprompter of Erie, Inc. v. City of ErieDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.