Legal Opinion
Gaeta v. Ridley School District
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 25, 2002No. 20 MAP 2001PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAYLOR, Justice:
At issue in this appeal is whether, pursuant to principles designed to implement a statutory scheme of competitive bidding for public construction projects, a school district was obliged to reject a low bid submission which included a bid bond that did not meet an advertised surety quality rating requirement.
In March of 1999, in accordance with competitive bidding requirements reposited in the Public School Code of 1949, 1 24 P.S. § 7-751, Appellant Ridley School District (the “District”) publicly circulated an invitation for bids for thirty-one prime contracts for the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- American Totalisator Co., Inc. v. SeligmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Ezy Parks v. LarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Harris v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Fischbach & Moore, Inc. v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- McIntosh Road Materials Co. v. WoolworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- JPay, Inc. v. Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Cardiac Science, Inc. v. Department of General ServicesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Glasgow, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Language Line Services, Inc. v. Department of General ServicesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Dragani v. Borough of AmblerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.