Legal Opinion

Ezy Parks v. Larson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 22, 1982No. 81-2-280PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUTCHINSON, Justice.

This is an appeal from the Commonwealth Court’s order of August 28,1982 continuing a preliminary injunction after hearing. The injunction had been granted originally without a hearing on June 10,1981. The order, per Judge Craig, restrained appellants Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) and its agents and employees from:(1) [Terminating [appellees] leases ... [with Penn-DOT],(2) expropriating improvements which [appellees] have made on those premises, (3) making any award of contracts or leases pursuant to the bidding and bid-opening procedures to be…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Feingold v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Pugh v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Roberts v. School Dist. of ScrantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Intraworld Industries, Inc. v. Girard Trust BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Elkin v. Bell Tel. Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Ardmare Construction Co. v. FreedmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Delaware River Port Authority v. ThornburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Amoco Oil Co. v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. E-Z Parks, Inc. v. LarsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Scientific Games International, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API