Legal Opinion

American Totalisator Co. v. Seligman

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 22, 1976No. 1192 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

American Totalisator Company, Inc. (AmTote) has filed an Amended Petition for Review naming as respondents the Commonwealth’s Secretary of Revenue, a Deputy Secretary of Revenue, the Executive Director of the Bureau of State Lotteries, the Department of Revenue and the Bureau of State Lotteries. Control Data Corporation (CDC) has intervened as a respondent. AmTote seeks an order of this Court enjoining the original respondents from entering into a contract for computer services and equipment for the establishment of what amounts to a State sponsored numbers game with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Price v. Philadelphia Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Faden v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Heilig Bros. Co., Inc. v. KohlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. R. S. Noonan, Inc. v. York School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Highway Express Lines, Inc. v. WinterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Three Rivers Cablevision, Inc. v. City of PittsburghDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. American Totalisator Co., Inc. v. SeligmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. White v. Township of Upper St. ClairCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Statewide Building Maintenance, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Convention Center AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Zurenda v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API