Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Johnson

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 29, 1933No. Docket No. 4891PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

An action for divorce was filed by plaintiff, the respondent herein, alleging certain acts of mental and physical cruelty inflicted by defendant upon plaintiff, in which defendant answered, denying the several acts of cruelty set forth, and asking that the decree of divorce be not granted.

The cause was tried and an interlocutory decree of divorce was granted plaintiff. Appellant moved for a new trial, which was denied, and thereupon took this appeal from the order and judgment.

Appellant enumerates various grounds for reversal, but relies principally upon two points: 1. That the trial court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Reay v. ReayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Hagar v. Home Stores Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Moss Estate Co. v. AdlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Westwood Temple v. Emanuel CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Stanley v. KawakamiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Burr v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Anderson v. PerminterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API