Legal Opinion
Burr v. Pacific Indemnity Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 23, 1942No. Civ. No. 11942PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, J. pro tem.
Two cross-appeals are herein presented on the one typewritten transcript: (1) An appeal by defendants from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, P. L. Burr, and (2) an appeal by plaintiff, Burr, from that part of the judgment only which failed to allow him as part of his recovery two additional items of $481.38 and $2,140.
The action arose out of work done by Burr for defendant DuPuy in the construction of the Broadway low level tun*355nel for Joint Highway District No. 13, and was for work, labor and materials furnished by said plaintiff. The amount of the judgment for plaintiff…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Morey v. PaladiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Porter v. the Arrow Head Reservoir Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Manha v. Union Fertilizer Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- San Francisco Bridge Co. v. Dumbarton Land & Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Brovelli v. BianchiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Lewis & Queen v. S. Edmondson & SonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Feykert v. HardyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Westwood Temple v. Emanuel CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- McAllister v. MetzgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.