Weissman v. Seehusen
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment in favor of defendant after trial before a jury in an action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals.
The record discloses these facts:
The following is an aerial photograph of the intersection Avhere the accident hereinafter described occurred:
At about 1:00 a. m., March 30, 1940, defendant was driving his automobile between twenty-five and thirty miles per hour in an easterly direction on Ramona Boulevard where it intersects City Terrace Drive. At about the same time plaintiff was crossing Ramona Boulevard from the north to .the south side, walking very…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Finkle v. TaitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Chase v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Flores v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Leek v. Western Union Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
3Cited by7 opinions
- Isaacs v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Shipway v. MoniseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Kashevaroff v. WebbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Ringo v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Ferner v. CasalegnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.