Legal Opinion

Ferner v. Casalegno

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 14, 1956No. Civ. 16624PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Plaintiff, in the middle of the night and while on foot and intoxicated, attempted to cross the Bay-shore Highway. He was hit by an automobile driven by defendant. In this action for the resulting injuries the major contention of plaintiff was that defendant had the last clear chance to avoid the accident. The trial court gave complete and proper instructions on that doctrine. The jury brought in a defendant’s verdict, and the trial judge denied plaintiff’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment and from the order denying his motion, his major…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hicks v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Rush v. LagomarsinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Robinson v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Rodabaugh v. TekusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Sheldon v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Biggar v. CarneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Fambrini v. StikkersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Cline v. AtwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Fambrini v. StikkersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API