Legal Opinion

Flores v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 22, 1936No. Civ. 10660PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITE, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment entered upon a directed verdict. Plaintiff Lupe Plores, wife of plaintiff Tgnacio Plores, sustained personal injuries when struck by an electric street car operated by defendant railway corporation. The accident occurred on November 7, 1934, at approximately 2 o’clock in the afternoon, at or near the intersection of Seventh Street and Broadway in the city of Los Angeles. Appellant Lupe Plores, in company with a large number of other pedestrians, was waiting at the northwest corner of the intersection, intending to cross…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Sheldon v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Moss v. H. R. Boynton Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Finkle v. TaitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Taha v. FinegoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Isaacs v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Young v. TassopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. McHugh v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. King v. UngerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API