Leek v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
This appeal is from a judgment in favor of plaintiff after trial before a jury. There is also a purported appeal from the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
Viewing the evidence most favorable to plaintiff, the facts in the instant ease are:
On May 21, 1936, the traffic at the intersection of Fourth Street and Pine Avenue in the city of Long Beach, California, was controlled by semaphores erected on each corner thereof, which operated in the following manner: Each semaphore consisted of arms appearing and disappearing, on which the words “stop” and “go” were painted respectively.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hurtel v. Albert Cohn, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1936
- Steinberger v. California Electric Garage Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Luse v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dennis v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Reeves v. LapintaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Meincke v. Oakland Garage, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Miller v. CranstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Wooldridge v. MountsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.