Legal Opinion

Wilkes-Barre Lace Mfg. Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 24, 1923No. 2226PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlaNd, Judge

Appellants imported cotton yarn which was admitted to have been made of cotton having a staple of If inches or more in length. It *520was exclusively used iu lace-curtain making. Tbe yarn was in skeins packed iñ'bales of 500 pounds each.' The testimony shows that before using the yarn for the manufacture of lace curtains it is conditioned or aged by putting it in a damp room for two or three days, and that in the course of the operations.in weaving it into curtains a loss is sustained of 20 per cent, the loss arising from the wáste from the bobbins when the yarn has run down to a length where the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Tide Water Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Chew Hing Lung v. WiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Movius v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. United States v. RichterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morse Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. United States v. Rice & Fielding, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  3. United States v. American Viscose Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API