Legal Opinion

Morse Bros. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 25, 1926No. 2581PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlaND, Judge

Paragraphs 16 and 17 of the emergency tariff act of May 27, 1921, read as follows:

16. Cotton having a staple of one and three-eighths inches or more in length, 7 cents per pound.

17. Manufactures of which cotton of the kind provided for in paragraph 16 is the component material of chief value, 7 cents per pound, in addition to the rates of duty imposed thereon by existing law. .

The merchandise involved in this suit consists of certain cotton cloth represented by several different protests and several entries. The merchandise was assessed for duty under the appropriate paragraph of the tariff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Bloomingdale Bros. & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  2. United States v. Edson Keith & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  3. Wilkes-Barre Lace Mfg. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. May Department Stores Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. FloryCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  3. S. S. Kresge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  4. United States v. WanamakerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  5. Lee v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API